Han and Roman Attitudes toward Technology

From the around second century B. C. E. to the troika century C. E. the Han and Roman attitudes toward engineering science were several(predicate) in how they excessivelyk superbia in both(prenominal) of their inventions with the Han accepting the role of the craftsmen and their technology they stimulated showed in enrolments 1-4. However, the Romans did not do as a great deal of this and did not care as much(prenominal) around the technology and how it could be utilized. This was shown in catalogues 5-8. Both Han China and the Romans did show a similarity in how their technology, even though it was bewitched dissimilarly, military serviceed to develop their Empires.Throughout these eight registers, e really wiz one of these had male from the upper build opus the roll. I think an additional document that could be useful in respondent the question of what the Han and Roman attitudes toward technology were would be a person from the lower class. This document would be useful because that the upper class did not show arouse about the technology that a commoner top executive acquit utilize such as hand tools and other common working items. The Han utilized their technology more to the fullest and took feel in what they invented.In roll 1 it shows that technology was not just utilise as a luxury, but was used a necessary way to help prevent disaster. In this case the Han were move to prevent flood and had walls roll in the hayals and pools. There were in addition citizenry assigned to inspect and get these technologies to help their plurality by preventing floods. The Han took pride in ability to concord their people safe from floods and other disasters. Document 2 focuses more on how the governing body monopolized the devising of tools and made them more cheaply and with less(prenominal) quality than the actual workers themselves did.Then the government activity raised prices on iron and many of the poor had to digress to old er technology. cardinal examples of this is iron became too expensive and woody plows were now being used or else of iron. Another example is that salt was too expensive and they couldnt afford to anneal their food. Huan Guan takes pride in the technology and feels that the government is not utilizing it proper and feels that the technology is dismissal to waste. Document 3 shows pride in their invention of the pestle and the mortar and how it helped to create very useful technology where, The cogency was ncreased ten times then by and by on, Benefit was increased a hundredfold. Document four commends the technology and its usefulness this instant contrasting with Document threes point of view. A yard this whitethorn be is that it is government-sponsored and the government is trying to micturate itself look good. The Romans, however, were not as kindle and shows little regard with how technology send away affect them. Document five shows this where Cicero shows no admira tion of craftsmen or any of their inventions. He says, All craftsmen spend their time in vulgar occupations. Cicero and the upper class applyt really have interest in craftsmen technology. Document seven suggests craftsmen did something that anybody could have done and does not really compliments them. He is implying that if the upper class doesnt need the technology, it isnt important. Now, Plutarch, on the other hand, was very satisfied with the technology of the roadstead and how nice they are in document six. He brags of Mile Markers and how this technology can be used by everybody. Frontinus was besides very proud of the technology in Rome. He specifically boasted of the aqueducts and said that they were snap off than the pyramids of Egypt.This opinion may be a little bias though, because he is the body of water commissioner for the city of Rome. Even though the Hans and Romans had different views on the use of technology, both of these empires benefitted greatly from the technology that was invented in this time. Plutarch was very randy about the roads in document six, and he had very good reason to be. The roads were kept in very good condition that allowed them to travel passim their entire empire. This was useful for delivering food across the empire in time of paucity and overly helped them to travel easier and quicker in time of battle.The Hans technology also helped them to grow as an Empire and keep their people safe as shown in document one. They had walls, canals, and workers specifically designated to prevent floods. What is shown in these documents is that the Han and Romans have different values fit(p) on technology, but also shows how they view the craftsmen and the people that may benefit from the technologies. The Han set their technology more and therefore determined more respect on the people who invented, whereas the Romans didnt not value the technology or the craftsmen nearly as much.